[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 45 (7-2019) ::
jwmseir 2019, 13(45): 129-133 Back to browse issues page
Assessment of Watershed Management Activities using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Analytical Network Process (Case study: Heidary Watershed, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province)
Rafat Zare Bidaki * , Bahram Abdollahi , Ahmad Ghanbari
Abstract:   (3793 Views)

In this research, in order to assess the biological and mechanical measures of flood and erosion control, two sub-watersheds of Heidari Watershed located in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province with similar climatic, hydrological, edaphic, vegetation and land use conditions as representative areas were selected. To assess the conducted measures, social criteria including education, participation, income level and beneficiaries' satisfaction and technical criteria including flood control, water storage, revenue increase and vegetation enhancement were used. The relationships between criteria, sub-criteria and under consideration options were defined in ANP and AHP models. Then, pairwise questionnaires of the factors in both ANP and AHP models were provided to 30 watershed management experts in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. The results showed that among the social sub-criteria, participation in the AHP model, and increased revenues in the ANP model, allocated more weights. Also, the flood reduction criterion has gained more weight between the technical sub-criteria, by both models AHP and ANP. Social criteria and increasing vegetation cover are important for selecting biological methods. While water storage and flood reduction are important for selecting mechanical approaches. Finally, the results showed that biological measures are preferable to flood and sediment control. The weight of biological and mechanical operations in the ANP model is 0.60 and 0.40, respectively and in the AHP model, the weights were 0.51 and 0.49, respectively.

Keywords: Biological treatments, Mechanical activities, Technical measures, Social measures
Full-Text [PDF 617 kb]   (62 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/11/13 | Accepted: 2019/03/24 | Published: 2019/11/4
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zare Bidaki R, Abdollahi B, Ghanbari A. Assessment of Watershed Management Activities using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Analytical Network Process (Case study: Heidary Watershed, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province). jwmseir 2019; 13 (45) :129-133
URL: http://jwmsei.ir/article-1-771-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 45 (7-2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم ومهندسی آبخیزداری ایران Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering
به اطلاع کلیه نویسندگان ، محققین و داوران  محترم  می رساند:

با عنایت به تصمیم  هیئت تحریریه مجله علمی پژوهشی علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری فرمت تهیه مقاله به شکل پیوست در بخش راهنمای نویسندگان تغییر کرده است. در این راستا، از تاریخ ۱۴۰۳/۰۱/۲۱ کلیه مقالات ارسالی فقط در صورتی که طبق راهنمای نگارش جدید تنظیم شده باشد مورد بررسی قرار خواهد گرفت.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645